<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wine Blogging Wednesday #31:2004 French Rabbit Pinot Noir</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/</link>
	<description>it’s a wine blog. it’s a hiking blog. yes! it’s a winehiking blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: winehiker</title>
		<link>http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-62825</link>
		<dc:creator>winehiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-62825</guid>
		<description>It's one year later, and it would appear that boxed wines cannot be defended. Well, shoot:  it's not that I have a chip on my shoulder about the quality of wines that are sold in a box - no, no! After all, I would have the makers and distributors of boxed wines wildly succeed.  But experience bears out that I might rue the day upon which I bring a well-meaning group of winehikers to a winery that would surprise us all with a pour from a boxed wine, the typical onus of the experience being decidedly inferior. 

True, the above is my opinion; the greater amalgam of opinion about boxed wines remains tantamount to general fact.  The real truth is, only you as a consumer of wine and wine touring can decide what "wine country experience" means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one year later, and it would appear that boxed wines cannot be defended. Well, shoot:  it&#8217;s not that I have a chip on my shoulder about the quality of wines that are sold in a box - no, no! After all, I would have the makers and distributors of boxed wines wildly succeed.  But experience bears out that I might rue the day upon which I bring a well-meaning group of winehikers to a winery that would surprise us all with a pour from a boxed wine, the typical onus of the experience being decidedly inferior. </p>
<p>True, the above is my opinion; the greater amalgam of opinion about boxed wines remains tantamount to general fact.  The real truth is, only you as a consumer of wine and wine touring can decide what &#8220;wine country experience&#8221; means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winehiker</title>
		<link>http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-62822</link>
		<dc:creator>winehiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-62822</guid>
		<description>Speaking personally, I'm curious to know what "If there’s one characteristic shared by these choices, they tend to come from the lower end of the non-traditional spectrum" really means. As a sometime wine blogger and one-time reviewer of a boxed wine, am I to be considered as a "low-end" and "non-traditional" wine reviewer?  If so, what, too, does that mean to you?  What is the opposite meaning?  What, if not non-traditional, is the greater blogger viewpoint about boxed wines if you would confer upon it traditional or high-end status? Please do educate us, Mr. Boxedwines.org Guy. The remainder of the wine world may just wish to learn from you; by and large you'll be successful if they do.  Indeed, I challenge you to respond here on Winehiker Witiculture to defend your position and/or define what "a successful boxed wine" really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking personally, I&#8217;m curious to know what &#8220;If there’s one characteristic shared by these choices, they tend to come from the lower end of the non-traditional spectrum&#8221; really means. As a sometime wine blogger and one-time reviewer of a boxed wine, am I to be considered as a &#8220;low-end&#8221; and &#8220;non-traditional&#8221; wine reviewer?  If so, what, too, does that mean to you?  What is the opposite meaning?  What, if not non-traditional, is the greater blogger viewpoint about boxed wines if you would confer upon it traditional or high-end status? Please do educate us, Mr. Boxedwines.org Guy. The remainder of the wine world may just wish to learn from you; by and large you&#8217;ll be successful if they do.  Indeed, I challenge you to respond here on Winehiker Witiculture to defend your position and/or define what &#8220;a successful boxed wine&#8221; really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Blogging Wednesday #50: Which wine, which wilderness? &#187; winehiker witiculture</title>
		<link>http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-60177</link>
		<dc:creator>Wine Blogging Wednesday #50: Which wine, which wilderness? &#187; winehiker witiculture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-60177</guid>
		<description>[...] Wine Blogging Wednesday #31: 2004 French Rabbit Pinot Noir  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wine Blogging Wednesday #31: 2004 French Rabbit Pinot Noir  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wines &#187; WBW #31 - Post-Game Commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-6809</link>
		<dc:creator>Wines &#187; WBW #31 - Post-Game Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-6809</guid>
		<description>[...] Plonk Avoided (Mostly).  Thankfully, nobody bought a 5-liter box of Franzia (or Almaden or Vella) and said, &#8220;Gaaak - this is awful!&#8221; We were hoping to avoid experiences that would put people off outside-the-bottle wines for the next decade, and, by and large, we were successful. There were a few notably bad ones. Spittoon hated Tesco Sicilian Red Wine, though Andrew later pointed out that Tesco is the UK equivalent of WalMart. Winehiker Witiculture scored French Rabbit Pinot Noir a mere 9 out of 20. Grape Juice didn&#8217;t find much to like in the little plastic bottles of Virgin Vines Shiraz. Tales of a Sommelier found the Paul Masson White Wine Carafe quite lacking. If there&#8217;s one characteristic shared by these choices, they tend to come from the lower end of the non-traditional spectrum - with the possible exception of the somewhat stylish French Rabbit, these are wines that don&#8217;t aspire to greatness, or even a high level of mediocrity. Let&#8217;s recognize the sacrifices made by these bloggers - they tried this stuff so that you (and many, many readers) won&#8217;t have to! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plonk Avoided (Mostly).  Thankfully, nobody bought a 5-liter box of Franzia (or Almaden or Vella) and said, &#8220;Gaaak - this is awful!&#8221; We were hoping to avoid experiences that would put people off outside-the-bottle wines for the next decade, and, by and large, we were successful. There were a few notably bad ones. Spittoon hated Tesco Sicilian Red Wine, though Andrew later pointed out that Tesco is the UK equivalent of WalMart. Winehiker Witiculture scored French Rabbit Pinot Noir a mere 9 out of 20. Grape Juice didn&#8217;t find much to like in the little plastic bottles of Virgin Vines Shiraz. Tales of a Sommelier found the Paul Masson White Wine Carafe quite lacking. If there&#8217;s one characteristic shared by these choices, they tend to come from the lower end of the non-traditional spectrum - with the possible exception of the somewhat stylish French Rabbit, these are wines that don&#8217;t aspire to greatness, or even a high level of mediocrity. Let&#8217;s recognize the sacrifices made by these bloggers - they tried this stuff so that you (and many, many readers) won&#8217;t have to! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Life Today</title>
		<link>http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-6473</link>
		<dc:creator>Wine Life Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiawinehikes.com/winehiker/1/wine-blogging-wednesday-312004-french-rabbit-pinot-noir/#comment-6473</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wine Blogging Wednesday #31: 2004 French Rabbit Pinot Noir...&lt;/strong&gt;

The winehiker pours a boxed wine, loses the girl, and ends the night with a new metaphor....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wine Blogging Wednesday #31: 2004 French Rabbit Pinot Noir&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The winehiker pours a boxed wine, loses the girl, and ends the night with a new metaphor&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
