With El Noche Del Bubbly approaching, this wine blog would be remiss to not profile at least one sparkler. And while I prefer my fermented fizzies a la Brut, I was charmed enough by the loquaciousness, if not the outright usable information, offered by the Wine for Newbies characterization of the 100%-Chardonnay 2002 Schramsberg Blanc de Blancs to pass it along to you.
(Geez, talk about loquaciousness!)
At any rate, it’s not clear who the author of this blog/podcast is. So for the sake of acronymic reference, I’ll call him “NNN” for “Not Nearly Newbie” or “Notorious No Name” - take your pick.
Nevertheless, I respect NNN’s willingness to tell it like it is:
“The good folks at Schramsberg in Calistoga, CA, were kind enough to send me a bottle of their Blanc de Blancs sparkling wine to evaluate. I agreed to accept a sample on the condition that I would not promise that the wine would be reviewed, or if it was, that the review would be glowing. I’m happy to tell readers and listeners about good wines I run across, but if I run across a dud, I’m going to say so. (Of course, what I think is a dud may be a treasure to someone else, so as with all reviews, take them with a grain of salt.) I received the sample free of charge, and I want to make sure I disclose that fact. I’m not like Robert Parker, who has the resources to buy every wine he reviews.”
Hmm. I’d be content with merely disclosing that I received the bottle as a press sample and let the bubbly tell the story. But I’m a sucker for the downright unabashed truth. Not surprisingly, NNN’s review of the Schramsberg is just as assuagingly capacious as his disclosure. However, I leave it to you, dear reader, click over to Wine for Newbies to peruse the remainder of NNN’s effervescent critique.
“PB”, one of three oenophiles writing for the Winecask blog, boasts over 25 years following his wine-tasting hobby but, according to Winecask, “has never had the luxury of an abundance of discretionary funds so his real experience, though vast, lies with the inexpensive end of the wine spectrum.”
That’s not to say that PB writes cheaply. He characterizes the 2001 Lenz Winery “Old Vine” Merlot, produced in the North Fork of Long Island, as:
“a nice medium garnet-colored pour with a dark core and a bouquet of faint green peppers with a center of spice and berries. Even on opening there are some nice layers happening here.
“In the mouth the first taste is rich with some more spice but everything is tightly wound. It needs to be breathed for a half hour so more.
“Now the flavors are layered again with a clear eucalyptus aroma, and dark berry fruit as well as other ‘things’ just popping up, fading out then something else, unsweetened baker’s chocolate (?) takes its place.
“This wine is rather elegant and really well made; balanced through and through. With a little more time breathing there is just more fruit and everything else all flowing together in a round wine that is just plain wonderful. This CAN’T be a New York wine can it?”
Apparently wines from Lenz are quite good. And no, I don’t necessarily deduce that from PB’s eloquent words, even if he and I both find his tasting experience somewhat incredulous. (A New York Merlot? From New York??) Yet Lenz Winery has actually done quite well in a taste-off against a few spectacular Bordeaux Chateaux.
Can’t wait to try one, PB.
“QBrain” must have turned off the gingko biloba supply to his intracranial contents prior to writing this - apparently his first - wine review. In his sole wine-related Food category entry, QBrain finds himself so consumed by his rant that he forgets to tell us the vintage of the hapless Electric Reindeer Cabernet Sauvignon, which ostensibly is a good Christmas marketing ploy for bad Christmas merrymaking plonk.
Rants QBrain:
“Absolutely SUCKS. Luckily, I didn’t pay for it. Even better, I did not make the mistake of giving it as a Christmas gift myself, but I will keep it in mind the next time I am socially obligated to give a gift to someone I dislike.
“I wonder if my sister-in-law hates me?”
I (a) halfheartedly (b) vaguely (c) shudder to wonder if QBrain will be gifting us with more wine reviews in the future.
Jonathan, a.k.a. “sweettoothjonny“ at The Poet’s Growlery writes about a chance encounter with a Riesling from Germany’s 12,000-acre Nahe region. The Nahe is an area that boasts a number of bizarre rock cliffs, including the Rotenfels, which is billed as the biggest rock face north of the Alps. I mention it because it shelters a narrow terraced vineyard at its base, one of the most famous in the region.
It is also the source of the Schloss Backelheim grapes. Quotes sweettoothjonny:
“This Nahe Riesling is a masterful demonstration of how good acidity can balance sugar to create a brilliantly textured and deliciously tasty wine. Though rolling out of the bottle with a frothy pour it quickly settles into a light straw color, quickly fading into the clear. The bouquet is markedly dry, perfumed with ripe pear, soft apple, bright tartar, and metal or stone. Despite being a rather sugary Spatlese, the acidity keeps the sweetness from dominating the wine, resulting in an unexpected creaminess.
“In fact, it could hardly be described as a sweet wine. It would be fantastic as an aperitif, or with clams, turkey, duck or a vinegary citrus salad. Be careful though, you can down the whole bottle without even thinking. We gave it a 90 (on the Parker Scale). At only $35, this I highly recommend you check out this QmP Riesling.”
Golly, I hope this Spatlese was sweet enough for ‘jonny’s tooth. I admit that I’ve been in a “red” mood these last cool winter nights, but having read sweettoothjonny’s post, I’m tempted to drink this white tonight. All I’ve got that’s close, however, is a 2004 Gottelmann Riesling Kabinett Trocken Munsterer Kapellenberg, also from the Nahe region, that supposedly has a delicate floral bouquet with honeysuckle, pear, and white peach aromas with the acidity and flavors of lemon peel, lime, minerals, crisp pear, and a long, clean finish.
OK, then! It’s quittin’ time.
Happy New Year, everyone!
~winehiker